the research or the reader?
Jael McHenry on Aug 02 2010 | Filed under: Book Talk, RESEARCH, Uncategorized
Every book requires research. Even if it’s set in your hometown and your protagonist is a whole lot like you, there will be some moment where you’re not sure of a fact – was the corner store there in 1994? Is it 15 miles to Waverly or 16? – and you will, in some way, do research.
What you choose to do with the facts you find, that’s trickier.
My first book, The Kitchen Daughter, is coming out next April. On one hand, I chose to “write what I know” – the protagonist is a passionate home cook (as I am) who lives in Philadelphia (as I did). On the other hand, she also has a sister (which I don’t) and, as the book opens, she has just lost both her parents (an experience I am fortunate enough not to have). And, most importantly, Ginny also struggles with Asperger’s syndrome – which, when I started writing about her in 2007, I knew next to nothing about.
I threw myself into research. Books, blogs, message boards, conversations, critiques, going in a dozen directions.
I learned about the spectrum, and special interests, and that if you’ve met one person with Asperger’s, you’ve met one person with Asperger’s. I absorbed what I learned, and wrote and rewrote and rewrote. Although Ginny is fictional, it was essential that my research about Asperger’s be accurately reflected in the book.
Contrast that with the book I’m writing now. Without going into too much detail – it’s still a secret, shh! – it takes place between 1895 and 1905. I’m embarrassed to tell you how much I don’t know about that time period. The amount of research I need to do is staggering, since the action of the book takes place in at least five cities, and involves everything from stage magic to ballet to mine accidents. It’s kind of scary.
I’m researching as I write, trying to move both parts of the process forward in parallel. One week I wrote a slam-bang scene set in the New York Public Library, only to find the next week that the library didn’t exist at the time. This I can easily fix by finding out what library did exist and correcting the details. I know I’ll have to go back and revise for countless things like this, but if I waited to complete the research before I started writing, day one would never come.
But the next layer of complexity is this: while most of the characters in book #2 are fictional, some are real people of the period, and the action happens in real places. And this is where I asked myself the title question: is my loyalty to the research, or the reader?
In a sense, the answer is simple: both. A novel packed with accurate facts that ignores the reader experience is a novel most readers will reject. Finding the balance is the trick. In a case like Asperger’s, accuracy is the highest priority, because anything else is unfair, not only to the reader but to real-life Aspies, since most readers will assume that what they are reading is a true and accurate depiction.
But with the book set around 1900, I’m starting to think I’ll be changing history. My cast includes a historical character whose career lasted more than two decades, and in order to get my protagonist’s career going more quickly, I need to change what happened to the real live person. In this case, the reader’s experience is more important to me than the research. I won’t change the big things, like moving a historical event to a different year or putting the New York Public Library up four years ahead of schedule, but the little things, I think I’m OK with changing. Because I want my readers along for the ride.
As a writer, are you absolutely faithful to the facts? As a reader, do you like a book more if you know the historical aspects are true to life?






















I have a very good way to cheat in my current WIP. The story takes place in a setting based on central Europe in the 9th to 11th centuries, but it’s a fantasy story in a made-up kingdom.
So I’ve done a lot of research about the history of the period, various cultures’ customs, foods, clothing, architecture, etc., but ultimately I have the freedom to combine, omit, or fudge those details as I wish for the story. The one thing I’m trying NOT to do is use real-life historical details, practices, cultural beliefs, or technologies from a later time period.
Still, if I goof up, it’s all fantasy, so I have an easier time of it than someone writing historical fiction in a real location!
Genie of the Shell´s last blog post ..Fantasy Blog Hop
Like?
0
As a reader, I don’t like a lot of historical facts clogging up the pace of the story. That being said, I am completely put off books that don’t at least get the essence of the era correct (the current trend to make historical romances politcally correct has all but turned me off historical romance). My mom is a serious history buff and reads huge historical tomes – correct facts, along with a good story, are a must with her (her memory and historical knowledge is formidable.)
The quickest way for me to stop reading an historical book (whatever the genre) is one that tries to re-write history by making it more politically correct and acceptable to today’s readership. Part of the joy of reading about another is learning about a way of life that, for better or worse, has passed and formed the foundation for the life we live today.
So – to answer your question – as a reader, stories should be well researched and, in both essence and fact, stay true the era in which they’re set.
Judy
Judy Croome´s last blog post ..WRITING TIPS- Punctuation Doing the Dash
Like?
0
I love reading historical fiction and assume that what I’m reading is correct, at least for the big items. I always assume that some lines are blurred. :)
Like?
0
It’s a very good question you ask Jael. Dennis Lehane’s last novel “The Given Day” felt clogged by historical preoccupations. The core of its problematic was interesting, but it was choked up in intellectual leftist dialogues and historical considerations.
I think the reader should be always first. Writers should try and make it as historically plausible as they can, but they should brush away things are getting in the way of the plot. My two cents…
Like?
0
I think you’re right, it’s absolutely about balance, and where that balance lies depends on each project. There was actually a brief discussion/debate about that on a recent post of mine, in which Turkish author Elif Shafak tackles why “write what you know” can be misleading advice:
http://kristanhoffman.com/2010/07/26/how-fiction-breaks-us-out-of-walls/
In my contribution to the discussion, I referenced Grey’s Anatomy. ;P
Kristan´s last blog post ..Scenes from three simultaneous worlds
Like?
0
Oh, and to Benoit’s point, being *too* loyal to the research can be much more detrimental to the reader, I think, than being *too* loyal to the reader is detrimental to the research. I read one “novel” set in ancient China, and it was so overloaded with historical details that it barely read as a story at all. Highly disappointing, and turned me off from that author quite a bit…
Kristan´s last blog post ..Scenes from three simultaneous worlds
Like?
0
My first writing teacher really encouraged people, even if they wanted to write creative non-fiction, to spend a lot of time writing fiction. Being too loyal to what actually happened can weigh a story down. Even if it is a true account, there is an element of “fictionalizing” that is necessary to create a good story. Think about how many memoirs have a little disclaimer in the beginning about “compressed timelines” and “composite characters.” Of course we try to balance it all, but I agree with Kristan and Benoit, if we can’t get it perfect, it’s better to skew towards the reader than the research.
Rebecca @ Diary of a Virgin Novelist´s last blog post ..Writers- Enough with the Self-Flagellation!
Like?
0
As a reader, I am more interested in the historical facts SERVING the story, not impeding it. It is fiction, not a textbook, that I’ve chosen to read, so my expectations are that I will be entertained first, with education a bonus.
As a writer, however, I can understand the worry, since there is a certain responsibility when you are using facts in a story. I think the best thing is to have an explanatory note at the end, giving reasons for the changes you made to history or facts.
Donna Cummings´s last blog post ..Observing Humans in the Wild
Like?
0
I’ve wondered about this balance as I work through my own WIP, because the question comes up a fair amount. I haven’t figured out the answer yet; maybe it needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis. I like your approach, Jael. Thanks for providing some guidance!
Tracy Hahn-Burkett´s last blog post ..Parenting Dilemma- When You Don’t Trust Your Kid’s Friend’s Parent
Like?
0
Excellent thoughts here on finding balance. Thank you!
Like?
0
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ThereseWalsh, Tracy Hahn-Burkett. Tracy Hahn-Burkett said: How much license can you take with facts in your fiction? @jaelmchenry explores the question at Writer Unboxed: http://tinyurl.com/3azje73 [...]
Like?
0
Holy cow! You must have read my mind. I’ve been trying to research a period in Spain and medieval military history to get my facts right, and I’m astounded by my ignorance. On the up-side of the whole affair, I’ve really been enjoying the research.
I’m also incredibly glad to see I’m not the only one who writes while researching. Thanks, Jael!
Teresa Frohock´s last blog post ..finding a writing mentor
Like?
0
I can’t help but write and research at the same time, because I often don’t know what particular point I need to discover until I get to it in the book. I always say that my books are as historically accurate as I can possibly make them–except when they aren’t. But if they aren’t, I think the author owes it to the reader to tell her what she changed and why.
Sarah Woodbury´s last blog post ..Historiography of the Welsh Conquest
Like?
0
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Elizabeth S Craig , Mary L. Tabor, Melodee Aaron, Melodee Aaron, Mark Dowe and others. Mark Dowe said: RT @ElizabethSCraig: Is a writer's loyalty to the research or the reader? http://dld.bz/pPH8 [...]
Like?
0
I don’t mind if minor details are a bit off, but if anything major is changed too much, I appreciate if the writer at least acknowledges that it’s an alternate history. I think, in fiction, the story is more important, although some balance should be maintained. Then again, I tend to read a lot of alternate histories, fantasy, and science fiction, so I’m accustomed to authors borrowing from history (or from science) and twisting things around to further the story. When it comes to accuracy, I agree with Judy Croome that it’s important to capture the essence of the era when writing historical fiction. Research should be done to make sure the basics are covered well. (And if you’re writing about a military group, that includes their standard practices and operations; if you’re writing about a religious cloister, that includes their normal customs, etc.) But as several others have hinted, if you spend too much time pointing out all the little things you got right, it could end up impeding the pace and flow of your story, and nobody will want to read it for long. So…balance.
Kristin Laughtin´s last blog post ..Part 2 of My San Diego Comic-Con 2010 Report!
Like?
0
I agree that there needs to be balance. As an historical fiction writer, I’m obsessive about facts and dates being correct. I try to verify historical events in as many places as possible because I know most readers assume what I’m writing is true to fact. That said, if I must fudge history for some reason to fit into my plot, I make a note of it at the end, and only if it’s a minor historical detail.
Your novel sounds fascinating! I can’t wait to read it!
Erika Robuck´s last blog post ..Review- Luncheon of the Boating Party
Like?
0
Kind of off the main point–but VERY much looking forward to reading THE KITCHEN DAUGHTER.
Like?
0
are you absolutely faithful to the facts? As a reader, do you like a book more if you know the historical aspects are true to life?
As a writer, I try to stay with the facts, but certain things that you can take artistic license with. As a reader, I feel if the facts are too sloppy or not true, I try to push past it if there are other things that redeem the story, such as characters.
Like?
0
Great responses, all! I didn’t know so many of the WU reader/writers were working on historical fiction! Glad to see I’ve got plenty of company on the balance-finding front.
Judy, I love your point about staying true to the period, too, and not plopping down modern characters with modern views in a world where their behavior was just not possible.
And as several people pointed out, when the author lets the research take over the book, it just wrecks the reader experience. My favorite example of this was Michael Crichton’s book Congo — certainly not one of his best — where he sets the scene, describes the characters, sets things moving…. and then interrupts the action with a big fat section of text on the difference between mountain and lowland gorillas.
Thanks again! Great conversation.
Jael McHenry´s last blog post ..research-reader balance today on WU
Like?
0
Fantastic! I am usually not given to superlatives but this article, followed by so many relevant comments was “spot on” as I am also writing a novel, historical fiction set in the post-world wars years.
Glad to read so many responses.
Patricia
http://pmpoetwriter.blogspot.com/
P-A-MCGOLDRICK´s last blog post ..POETRY UPDATE!
Like?
0
I’m far more forgiving of historical inaccuracy than psychological errors. I read for the drama about *people* and insights about human nature.
Jan O’Hara´s last blog post ..Announcement-Announcement-Icebox Behemoth
Like?
0
Thank you so much for taking the time to do your research while writing your book about a character with Asperger’s. As a writer I understand that sometimes the story has to take precedence over the totally-completely-unvarnished truth. If the story is no fun to read, no one will read it. But as the director of a non-profit for Asperger’s/high functioning autistic students, their families and educators I also know that media has played a huge part in educating the public about the challenges these folks face. Non-fiction and fiction articles, books and movies have made the struggles of people with autism relatable for those unaffected. For a few minutes typical people live the life and face the difficulties of people with autism. That’s a blessing to our community.
After your book is published you will no doubt get a few letters from people with autism or their families telling you what a terrible person you are because you totally misrepresented them and perpetuated stereotypes, etc. I can tell this without reading your book because this behavior is so very prevelant in autism publishing. It happens to just about everyone. There’s a handful of really angry, pissy people out there. Don’t worry about it. You did your research and you did your best. As fiction writers that’s the best we can ever do.
Now if we could just get the people who are selling questionable treatments to our families to admit that they’re fiction writers too I’d be happy.
Like?
0
Cassie — I really appreciate your perspective on this — thanks for chiming in. I do definitely expect some negative reactions, either because people believe I’ve “gotten it wrong” (which I’ve tried so hard not to do) or because they think I have no right to write about Asperger’s in the first place, since I don’t have a personal connection and it isn’t “my” story.
But as you said, both fiction and nonfiction portrayals of people with Asperger’s and autism are out there, and that’s how people with no previous personal experience (like me, three years ago) will learn what it means. My book isn’t an “issue” book per se, but I do hope that some people who read it will think a little differently about Asperger’s than they did before they picked it up.
Jael McHenry´s last blog post ..tv talk on intrepid media
Like?
0
I just did a blog post about this a week ago! My dilemma is whether to use real names and places in the story to order to stay true to history. I feel like places are fine but names need to be changed to protect their families. But then people have written fiction about actual people for years and seems to be accepted. However, I am not writing about anyone famous.
I think you are correct about finding a balance. I find that, as a reader, I enjoy going back after reading a historical novel to find out more about the setting and events that were depicted in the story. So where do you draw the line on how MUCH fact? Look forward to reading your book!
Hallie Sawyer´s last blog post ..Did you have back to school jitters
Like?
0