Writing Comes Before Research, Or at Least at the Same Time
Jeanne Kisacky on May 23 2010 | Filed under: RESEARCH
Please welcome guest contributor Jeanne Kisacky to WU. Scholar and architectural historian, Jeanne was a finalist in our search for our unpubbed contributor, and we thought her essay was fantastic.
Jeanne tells us ”I’m a recovering architect (anyone interested in joining the charter chapter of Architects Anonymous, please contact me); and an escaped editor. For the next nine months I’m a chained-to-the-desk nonfiction writer (I hate deadlines). But when the chains are removed and the recovery is over, I will return to my epic novel. When I do, I resolve to stop writing like Salieri. The composition of “Too Many Words” is going to meet, and learn to fear, the red pen.”
So she knows a thing or two about research-aholism. Thanks for sharing with us, Jeanne. Enjoy!
Since most writers are readers, research is one of the joys of the profession. Research is also crucial to good writing–it provides necessary details for writers to write convincing, resonant, accurate scenes. It fuels creative thought. While you research the details of your topic, some deep part of your psyche is figuring out how to use those details in your story.
There is, however, a dark side to research. Like watching TV, it is a passive activity. And, like TV, sometimes it is hard to stop the sitting and start the doing. As the information piles up on your desktop and in your brain, it becomes overwhelming. Doubts creep in about how to finish the darned thing that is now so big it’s out of your control. You’ve become a researchaholic.
The only cure is to put writing back into its proper place. Until you put pen to paper (or fingers to computer keyboard), you just don’t know what it is you need to know. Writing provides the questions; research provides the answers. Without a question, research mostly provides irrelevant answers (all those little research tidbits that live on sticky notes and scraps of paper). Without a question, research can also pull you in different directions, away from your intended storyline. Computer research is almost impossible to keep on course–it is non-linear, each link you click takes you in a different direction and to a different place. How do you keep focused on your story’s needs when getting lost on the web is so much easier?
At best, writing and research happen in regular alternation, with writing, not research, driving the train. Putting writing first puts you, the writer, back into the active, controlling role. Before you sit down for a week-long read of that pile of books you just checked out from the library or before you sit for weeks on end googling all around your topic, first write the bare bones, outline, or crappy first draft of whatever scene in your head made you think you needed to do some research. Sure, it will be inaccurate. Sure, it will be incomplete and need rewriting. But it will be your voice, your thoughts, your story. Then when you do some research, you’ll have some good focused questions and the answers you need will jump out at you. When you take those answers back to that scene you were writing and add in the pertinent details, you might also be tempted to keep writing and start some new scenes inspired by all that research.
Putting writing first will also help you avoid one of the lesser known time-wastes of research. It can take a lot of time to write your way ‘out’ of your research and back into your own thoughts. I’ve read way too many student papers which are pages of dry jumbles of their research notes with one final paragraph that finally (Finally!) gets around to saying what they want to say, not reiterating the research. In the end, research gives you all the details, but until you start writing, in your own words and thoughts, it doesn’t get you anywhere.






















Thank you very much! This article helps me a lot. As a totally beginner in this field I want to create a meaningful work with lots of details and information, but what usually happen is the fact that I’m lost in research. It’s much worse than lost in translation for sure, because those endless and pointless researches lead to anywhere!
.-= cassle´s last blog ..Is It Worth The Time to Organize The Desk? =-.
Like?
0
Great advice. I do minimal research before writing. I am a plotter, so I have an idea where the story is going, but my experience has been that I don’t really know what to research until I’ve written the first draft.
The minimal research is about possibilities: can I set the story where I want to? Is there an event I can anchor the story to? (my current novel is anchored in the Jonestown massacre).
After that I note as I write what I need to do more research on as I write.
One thing I’ve noticed for me is that I do need access to the internet when I write. I sometimes get stuck and need to look up a fact. If I can’t look it up and move on, I stall. It required discipline to stop researching.
Like?
0
Wow. Excellent points made here. Thank you!
Like?
0
Perry-keeping a separate list of what you need to research later while you keep writing is a great strategy. You have more willpower than I do with internet during writing–in my experience, one google search deserves another, and another . . .
Like?
0
“Put the writing first.” Good advice all around. Great post!
I don’t do too much research for my writing, but even just when I’m idly curious about something (like the original Iron Man comic story, after watching Iron Man 2 this weekend) I can get lost in Wikipedia for like 20-40 min at a time!
.-= Kristan´s last blog ..Me versus me =-.
Like?
0
Nice article. Thanks. I tend to write first, as you say, and then put the research in later. Usually to catch the important authentic detail of a place or building. I strongly believe in visual aids to help writing, kick-start the grey matter and really get the muse going.
Like?
0
Jeanne, this is so true! I’ve done a ton of research for my WIP, and most of the time, the researching and writing have gone hand-in-hand. At one point, I did need to stop writing and just research for six months; then I resumed writing until my first draft was finished. I know I’ve got another round of research coming later, but it will be much more focused this time, aimed at filling in gaps or deepening characters, setting and plot details rather than just trying to figure out what’s going on.
If you’re writing about something that fascinates you (and shouldn’t you be?), it’s so easy to get lost in the research. Letting one task inform the other keeps everything interesting, lets you explore possibilities and keeps you from straying to far from the path you mean to be on in the first place: the one that leads to a completed book!
Like?
0
Cassle – keeping on track is one of the hardest things to do with writing, because where the track is going is not always clear. But idle curiosity is not a bad thing, if it gets you to stop being idle. :-)
Kristan, and Neil, it sounds like you already put the writing first.
Tracy, your six months of research sounds like it must have been for a pretty in-depth project. Did you have a hard time getting back into the writing after it?
Like?
0
Thank you for this wonderful post, Jeanne.
I often worry that I don’t know enough about a subject to write with authority. However, I can’t keep all the facts in my head after I’ve read them. Your suggestions are very practical!
.-= Jessica Baverstock – Creativity’s Workshop´s last blog ..Turning Over an Old Leaf =-.
Like?
0
Not at all, Jeanne. I was itching to get back to the writing and jotting down ideas generated by my research the whole time. (And part of the reason it was six months was because I have two young kids and write other stuff at the same time, so I wasn’t doing full-time research.) I couldn’t wait to get back to writing the ms itself.
.-= Tracy Hahn-Burkett´s last blog ..The Oversensitive Adoptive Mom =-.
Like?
0
Jeanne, I agree wholeheartedly that “Writing provides the questions; research provides the answers. Without a question, research mostly provides irrelevant answers…” I tend to write and research more or less simultaneously, putting down story elements and researching when I need to along the way. This also opens doors to many wonderful, surprising discoveries about how the story in fact connects with reality. Very exciting, and so much fun!
Like?
0
“Writing provides the questions; research provides the answers.”
Sounds like a mantra to me!
Also, it helps me to process a topic, an essay, by using mindmapping techniques, visual/graphic organizers in general. With a few colored markers, a blank sheet of paper, and a bit of time, I can map out the facts and also spot areas that are lacking and need more research.
Writing and research are a winning combination!
.-= Patricia Anne McGoldrick´s last blog ..PARSLEY, SAGE, ROSEMARY, AND WHAT???? =-.
Like?
0
As an historical fiction writer, I tend to hide behind research when the actual project seems daunting. Thanks for the motivation to come up for air and produce something!
.-= Erika Robuck´s last blog ..Giveaway! Free Book! =-.
Like?
0
Great advice! Although I have to say that as a historical fiction writer, I do think it’s important that I do some basic research before I start writing–or even outlining. The more I know about the times I’m writing in, the better I can construct characters who might have lived in those times and the events to make a plot. But it’s definitely important to just start telling the story at some point, and move the research to a ‘supporting’ role instead of center stage!
Like?
0
Wow! What fantastic advice! There have been times when I’ve gotten so lost and so overwhelmed in my research that I’ve just chunked the entire article altogether.
“At best, writing and research happen in regular alternation, with writing, not research, driving the train. Putting writing first puts you, the writer, back into the active, controlling role.”
Thanks! I really needed to read that today!
Like?
0
Jessica and Sharon, thank you for the kind comments.
Patricia — I’m curious about your mindmapping techniques. When I write I make charts, use different colored highlighters, and draw maps and floor plans–do you map out other things?
Erika and Anna, yeah, if you’re deep into worldbuilding (historical or fantastical) sometimes it is necessary to immerse in the research and the details. I hope you have some tricks to get back to the story. I find that when I go a day without writing, research just takes over. I’ve lost months that way.
Ami, glad it was the right advice at the right time.
Like?
0
Ami–Looking forward to reading articles at your website.
Jeanne–I use mindmapping for mapping out stories, characters, ideas for poems, any writing that begins with a central topic/idea; then I branch out with colourful branches of sub-topics/characteristics/events. Then each of these items can be expanded upon. Basically, I have been inspired by British mindmapping expert, Tony Buzan’s, work. You might want to check out this link: http://www.thinkbuzan.com/intl/articles/view/how-to-create-a-mind-map. Overall, I just have fun going different directions and using colours and images in mindmaps–I think it adds a lot to the creative process!
.-= Patricia Anne McGoldrick´s last blog ..PARSLEY, SAGE, ROSEMARY, AND WHAT???? =-.
Like?
0
“How do you keep focused on your story’s needs when getting lost on the web is so much easier?” I’m sorry, but this made me laugh, given the title of my recent blog post which will show up below. Thank you for the synchronous reminder. :)
.-= Jan O’Hara´s last blog ..Seeking Internet Sobriety =-.
Like?
0
[...] an article at Writer Unboxed, scholar and architectural historian, Jeanne Kisacky writes: At best, writing and [...]
Like?
0