“It’s a new dawn, it’s a new day . . . “
Kathleen Bolton on Apr 05 2010 | Filed under: Business, REAL WORLD
The iPad is now out.
Though reviews from the early adopters are mixed, the functionality and use of the techie gadget du jour is beside the point. On April first, the e-book war between Amazon and publishers, spurred by Apple’s almost overnight rise into the e-book market, launched into phase two. Two months ago, Ben Parr noted:
Amazon’s clearly worried, which is why it’s launching an app store and used its earnings report to remind us that the Kindle is far from dead. But if publishers decide to abandon the Kindle, then Apple will have won the war by default.
That’s why Amazon decided to use its biggest weapon, Amazon.com itself, against Macmillan to send a message to every publisher: If you don’t play by its rules, then you can’t be in its store. While a publisher can likely survive without the Kindle, the same cannot be said for Amazon.com. Publishers simply cannot afford to leave the world’s largest online retailer.
The Kindle and the iPad offer different experiences. The Kindle’s battery life and e-ink are strong selling points for the device as a reader, but the iPad offers so much more. Apple’s banking on those extra features and its undeniable reach to turn the Kindle into an endangered species.
By mid-March, Amazon had suffered backlash for their hardline against Macmillan and started backpedling — somewhat. Some publishers would be able to set their own prices. But not all. Via Mashable, Christine Warren noted:
The agreements (with Amazon) that have been made with the five publishers signed to work with Apple — Macmillan, Harper Collins, Penguin, Hachette, and Simon & Schuster — will not be passed on to smaller publishers.
It seems even the agreement with the other four publishers outside of Macmillan (known as Agency Four) isn’t set in stone.
Cader also writes:
“The indications are that if the Agency Four have not finalized new digital sales agreements with Amazon prior to the launch of Apple’s iPad, they could face delisting from direct sale at Amazon, as Macmillan did.”
Translation: If those publishers don’t finalize a new digital agreement with Amazon before the launch of the iPad, they risk being removed from Amazon.com.
Amazon has reached agency deals with HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster and Hachette. But not Penguin:
Predictions that the move to an agency model would be messy have proven correct with the most serious consequence being the inability of Penguin and Amazon to reach an agreement over terms of sale. As a result, Penguin e-books released beginning today will not be available at the Kindle store. E-books released prior to April 1 are still for sale at the $9.99 price.
Where Penguin books are available: Barnes and Noble.com, Sony, Kobo, eBooks.com, reader applications on the iPhone and soon on the iBookstore for the iPad.
But however this new age in digital books resolves itself, authors once again are caught in the middle. While Penguin and Amazon work to resolve their issues on the e-book front (Penguin’s print titles are still available on Amazon’s store), who can say how many e-sales Penguin authors have lost in the interim?
Who do you think will win this war? Amazon? or Apple? What about the iPad? Revolutionary e-reader or overhyped gadget?





















“What about the iPad? Revolutionary e-reader or overhyped gadget?”
Probably a little bit of both? I just saw one (a coworker had it) and it’s definitely a beautiful, sleek little thing. I would much prefer that over my iPod Touch, particularly for reading. However, at the price point, I can’t justify getting one right now. And I imagine that’s true for a lot of people.
What I wonder is if Amazon will work to make the Kindle more competitive (i.e., not just a dedicated e-reader)…
.-= Kristan´s last blog ..This whole crazy writing thing =-.
Like?
0
I think part of the problem is Amazon’s tendency to try to retain ‘control’ not only of the publishers (and through them the authors), but also the readers. You can’t read a kindle formatted e-book on other e-readers. How you can use it for other file formats (hough recently undergoing a desperate expansion) is also limited compared to other e-readers. I think Amazon is dreaming of an Amazon-only world, and having been a GDI since way before college days, that bothers me. Monopoly anyone?
Like?
0
ITA, it feels like Amazon wants to keep dictating the terms, but doesn’t realize that things have shifted and they don’t hold all the chips anymore. BUT, I’m not convinced that the iPad is going to revolutionize hand-held devices like the iPhone did. I’m not seeing how it can be essential to my life . . . yet.
Like?
0
For me, the iPad is definitely a luxury item. I believe the estimate is that 7.1 million will be sold this year. I won’t be part of that number although I would love one. If I were still working full time as a management consulting, and so, traveling a lot (and getting paid more!), I would rush out to buy one.
.-= Rebecca @ Diary of a Virgin Novelist´s last blog ..Study Buddies =-.
Like?
0
This, from today’s Publishers Lunch:
It is on.
I think we’re still waiting to hear how Random House will handle things with Amazon and Apple, re: the agency model, too.
Like?
0
Personally, I hope they both survive. Competition is good. You don’t want any ‘one’ business to have a monopoly. We preordered our iPads. They are lovely to read on. Playing games and watching movies is a bonus. Once I get my keyboard this week, I’m going to try writing on it. (I bought mine in place of a laptop.)
The Kindle app works on the iPad. You just can’t buy books through the app, but you can read from your library. So far, I love the device. It’s exactly what I thought it would be and more.
Like?
0
I think the iPad is an overhyped gadget, but mostly I don’t like it because it’s another sealed, untinkerable block from Apple that encourages a passive, consumerist type of usage (you have to buy apps AND content, because they’ve successfully blurred the line between the two).
Cory Doctorow said it best here: http://www.boingboing.net/2010/04/02/why-i-wont-buy-an-ipad-and-think-you-shouldnt-either.html
But like Jordan said above, competition is good. Though I hope the iPad doesn’t become the dominant ebook reader (and at this price point, that’s unlikely), it’s heartening to see it put a fear into Amazon.
.-= Leah Raeder´s last blog ..Prose fragment: fever dream of spring. =-.
Like?
0
If we were talking strictly numbers, the iPad vs the Kindle, I think the iPad would win, hands down. I say that because I think the majority of people will buy the iPad, not for the main purpose of reading on it, but for all the other goodies. Jordan Summers already commented that the iPad is lovely to read on, and that watching movies and playing games on it is a bonus. I think the majority of people will think the opposite: They want to watch movies and play games, and being able to read on it is the bonus.
I still think there’s some value in having a less-expensive, dedicated e-reader, but the question is, will most people? Or will they just want more? Will they ask: It can ONLY read books? That’s IT? WHY?
I don’t personally own an e-reader (though I’d like one), but just based on how much I read on my iPhone (which is a lot, though I originally bought it for work), I can appreciate the value of a multi-function device.
I hope nobody wins this “war.” Competition is good, and I think everyone deserves to have a choice. Can’t have that when only one company “wins.”
Like?
0